Your Website Score is

Similar Ranking

29
AGRONET | ZAWADKA ARTYKUŁY HODOWLANE
agronetzawadka.pl
26
FREE ADULT VDATING
vdating.online
19
CYBERHITS -PRORANK
cyberhits.de
19
PRORANK WEBSITE SEO DOCTOR - BEST TOOLS
sitecheckdoctoronline.net
19
ESTIMATE WEBSITE WORTH | TOOLS | BOOT RANKING | CALCULATOR
seo-online.xyz
19
BESUCHER UND LINKS RANKING WEBWEBKATALOG | VERZEICHNIS
rankingonline-verzeichnis.org
19
BEST BOOKMARKING SERVICE WEBSITE ONLINE | OUTLOOK
domain-seositeoutlook.eu

Latest Sites

31
DOWNLOAD PHP SCRIPTS - CODELIST.SITE
codelist.site
2
XXX-FILES | MOBILE ПОРНО
ero.mag.su
12
FILMY PORNO DARMOWE NA PORNOWYSPA.COM
pornowyspa.com
31
FILECADOM - FREE FILE UPLOAD
filecadom.com
31
VIDEO EDITOR ONLINE | ALL IN ONE VIDEO TOOL | KEEP CHANGE IT
keepchangeit.com
29
AGRONET | ZAWADKA ARTYKUŁY HODOWLANE
agronetzawadka.pl
31
TURBO WEBSITE REVIEWER
traffic-submit.com

Top Technologies

Font Awesome
Font Scripts
Apache
Web Servers
Google Font API
Font Scripts
Twitter Bootstrap
Web Frameworks
Nginx
Web Servers
LiteSpeed
Web Servers
Google Tag Manager
Tag Managers

29 agronetzawadka.pl Last Updated: 2 weeks

Success 55% of passed verification steps
Warning 15% of total warning
Errors 30% of total errors, require fast action

Desktop

Mobile

Performance Desktop Score 78%
Best Practices Desktop Score 69%
SEO Desktop Score 100%
Progressive Web App Desktop Score 62%
Performance Mobile Score 35%
Best Practices Mobile Score 69%
SEO Mobile Score 99%
Progressive Web App Mobile Score 63%
Page Authority Authority 0%
Domain Authority Domain Authority 0%
Moz Rank 0.0/10
Bounce Rate Rate 0%
Charset Encoding
Great, language/character encoding is specified: UTF-8
Title Tag 36 Characters
AGRONET | ZAWADKA ARTYKUŁY HODOWLANE
Meta Description 205 Characters
AGRONET ZAWADKA to przede wszystkim ogrodzenia elektryczne oraz części przeznaczone do ich budowy. Poidła, karmidła dla hodowców bydła, koni i psów. Największy asortyment produktów zootechnicznych w Polsce
Effective URL 29 Characters
https://www.agronetzawadka.pl
Excerpt Page content
AGRONET | ZAWADKA artykuły hodowlane ...
Keywords Cloud Density
00 zł28 koszyka24 dostawy13 zobacz12 więcej12 kosztów12 zawiera12 cena12 elektryzator7 zwierząt6
Keyword Consistency Keyword density is one of the main terms in SEO
Keyword Freq Title Desc Domain H1 H2
00 zł 28
koszyka 24
dostawy 13
zobacz 12
więcej 12
kosztów 12
zawiera 12
cena 12
elektryzator 7
zwierząt 6
Google Preview Your look like this in google search result
AGRONET | ZAWADKA ARTYKUŁY HODOWLANE
https://www.agronetzawadka.pl
AGRONET ZAWADKA to przede wszystkim ogrodzenia elektryczne oraz części przeznaczone do ich budowy. Poidła, karmidła dla hodowców bydła, koni i psów. N
Robots.txt File Detected
Sitemap.xml File No Found
Whois Is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system
Updated: 1970-01-01 / 50 years
Create on: 1970-01-01 / 50 years
Expires on: 1970-01-01 / 610 months 12 days
Page Size Code & Text Ratio
Document Size: ~179.47 KB
Code Size: ~72.13 KB
Text Size: ~107.33 KB Ratio: 59.81%

Social Data

Delicious Total: 0
Facebook Total: 584
Google Total: 0
Linkedin Total: 0
Pinterest Total: 0
Stumbleupon Total: 0
Tumblr Total: 0
Vk Total: 0

Estimation Traffic and Earnings

8
Unique Visits
Daily
14
Pages Views
Daily
$0
Income
Daily
224
Unique Visits
Monthly
399
Pages Views
Monthly
$0
Income
Monthly
2,592
Unique Visits
Yearly
4,704
Pages Views
Yearly
$0
Income
Yearly

Technologies

PWA - Manifest

AGRONET ZAWADKA AGRONET ZAWADKA ZAWADKA

The web app manifest is a simple JSON file that gives you, the developer, the ability to control how your app appears to the user in areas where they would expect to see apps (for example, a mobile device's home screen)
Param name
AGRONET ZAWADKA
Param short_name
ZAWADKA
Param start_url
/?utm_source=pwa
Param display
standalone
Param background_color
#6E7067
Param theme_color
#E00B60

Desktop

Desktop Screenshot
Minimize third-party usage Third-party code blocked the main thread for 0 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading
Total Blocking Time 140 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
JavaScript execution time 0.7 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this
Defer offscreen images Potential savings of 138 KB
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive
Server Backend Latencies 0 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance
Properly size images Potential savings of 81 KB
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time
Speed Index 1.7 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated
First CPU Idle 3.1 s
First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle).
Avoid enormous network payloads Total size was 3,414 KB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times
Minimizes main-thread work 1.9 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this
First Contentful Paint 0.9 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 2 vulnerabilities detected
Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers
Avoid chaining critical requests 13 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load
Avoid an excessive DOM size 1,366 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow)
First Meaningful Paint 1.1 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible
Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 137 requests • 3,414 KB
To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file
Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 45 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page
Max Potential First Input Delay 120 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task
Time to Interactive 3.5 s
Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive
Network Round Trip Times 0 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance
Page load is not fast enough on mobile networks Interactive on simulated mobile network at 16.2 s
A fast page load over a cellular network ensures a good mobile user experience
Estimated Input Latency 30 ms
Estimated Input Latency is an estimate of how long your app takes to respond to user input, in milliseconds, during the busiest 5s window of page load. If your latency is higher than 50 ms, users may perceive your app as laggy
Remove unused CSS Potential savings of 42 KB
Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity
Serve images in next-gen formats Potential savings of 1,193 KB
Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption
User Timing marks and measures 4 user timings
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences
Server response times are low (TTFB) Root document took 370 ms
Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response
Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 230 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles
Efficiently encode images Potential savings of 271 KB
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data

Mobile

Mobile Screenshot
First Meaningful Paint 4.7 s
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible
Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 121 requests • 3,426 KB
To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file
Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 51 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page
Max Potential First Input Delay 340 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task
Time to Interactive 13.5 s
Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive
Network Round Trip Times 0 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance
Page load is not fast enough on mobile networks Interactive at 13.5 s
A fast page load over a cellular network ensures a good mobile user experience
First Contentful Paint (3G) 6193 ms
First Contentful Paint 3G marks the time at which the first text or image is painted while on a 3G network
Estimated Input Latency 120 ms
Estimated Input Latency is an estimate of how long your app takes to respond to user input, in milliseconds, during the busiest 5s window of page load. If your latency is higher than 50 ms, users may perceive your app as laggy
Tap targets are not sized appropriately 98% appropriately sized tap targets
Interactive elements like buttons and links should be large enough (48x48px), and have enough space around them, to be easy enough to tap without overlapping onto other elements
Document uses legible font sizes 93.5% legible text
Font sizes less than 12px are too small to be legible and require mobile visitors to “pinch to zoom” in order to read. Strive to have >60% of page text ≥12px
Remove unused CSS Potential savings of 42 KB
Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity
Serve images in next-gen formats Potential savings of 1,425 KB
Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption
User Timing marks and measures 3 user timings
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences
Server response times are low (TTFB) Root document took 230 ms
Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response
Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 1,770 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles
Efficiently encode images Potential savings of 462 KB
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data
Reduce the impact of third-party code Third-party code blocked the main thread for 610 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading
Total Blocking Time 1,260 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
Reduce JavaScript execution time 3.1 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this
Defer offscreen images Potential savings of 138 KB
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive
Server Backend Latencies 0 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance
Properly size images Potential savings of 27 KB
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time
Speed Index 5.9 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated
First CPU Idle 12.0 s
First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle).
Avoid enormous network payloads Total size was 3,426 KB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times
Minimize main-thread work 6.0 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this
First Contentful Paint 3.0 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 2 vulnerabilities detected
Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers
Avoid chaining critical requests 12 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load
Avoid an excessive DOM size 1,319 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow)

Information Server

Response Header HTTP headers carry information about the client browser, the requested page and the server
HTTP/2 200 
date: Sun, 09 Feb 2020 12:11:50 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
x-powered-by: DCSaaS
strict-transport-security: max-age=60; includeSubdomains
x-cache-namespace: 17147
x-xss-protection: 1
content-encoding: gzip
server: DCSaaS/httpd
x-content-type-options: nosniff
set-cookie: fp=971930495; Path=/; HttpOnly; Max-Age=315360000
DNS Records DNS Resource Records associated with a hostname
View DNS Records